Officers Rights

Obtaining personal Evidence Kimaya Griffin Criminal Evidence Obtaining Physical Evidence This scenario could be very tricky. The reply could be two yes and no but I consider that because the military police policeman was given permission to look for the car then(prenominal) the paper ruckle was not off limits, it was a pop out of the try. The policeman had permission to search the car and as an officer the officer searched the car very well by checking alone viable stash spots and discovered the drugs. The reason I regularise that this is tricky because the pedestal was closed and the officer had to fall away the traction in order to find the drugs. Looking into the bag is not the same as just searching the car. Although the officer did not have to have a warrant because the search was within a vehicle and vehicles arent stationery so the officer has the right to protect the people by looking.

So with that being said using the establish in lead may not go as well for the prosecution. The antitank measure could say that the officer asked to searched the car and not go into the bag so a matter of consent could be an issue and work in favor of the suspect. However the evidence could be used against the defendant but I dupet know how much good it would do in convicting the defendant if the defendant has a good lawyer because they would be satisfactory to fight against the evidence and the prosecution could lose its case.If you need to raise up a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay